Within the module “How to work with the defence department”, suppliers are given information concerning ways to appeal. Does this not encourage resorting to appeals, in particular on the part of candidates who were not selected?

The ministry of defence has decided to move towards greater transparency, to facilitate the access of companies, particularly SME/SMI, to public contracts. At the same time, the ministry of defence has also decided to aim for increased professionalism in all that relates to purchasing.

This will significantly improve the confidence level of potential ministry of defence suppliers towards their client and thus minimise the risk of lawsuits or disputes. The transparency that the ministry of defence is aiming for should thus benefit both parties.

In case of a procedural fault, it is legitimate for a candidate who considers himself wronged to seek reparation by appealing to the contracting administration, or even through the courts. On the other hand there is nothing to fear from a groundless lawsuit filed by a supplier, which is often the case for candidates who were not selected.